git-cherry-pick man page on Hurd

Man page or keyword search:  
man Server   6387 pages
apropos Keyword Search (all sections)
Output format
Hurd logo
[printable version]

GIT-CHERRY-PICK(1)		  Git Manual		    GIT-CHERRY-PICK(1)

NAME
       git-cherry-pick - Apply the changes introduced by some existing commits

SYNOPSIS
       git cherry-pick [--edit] [-n] [-m parent-number] [-s] [-x] [--ff] <commit>...
       git cherry-pick --continue
       git cherry-pick --quit
       git cherry-pick --abort


DESCRIPTION
       Given one or more existing commits, apply the change each one
       introduces, recording a new commit for each. This requires your working
       tree to be clean (no modifications from the HEAD commit).

       When it is not obvious how to apply a change, the following happens:

	1. The current branch and HEAD pointer stay at the last commit
	   successfully made.

	2. The CHERRY_PICK_HEAD ref is set to point at the commit that
	   introduced the change that is difficult to apply.

	3. Paths in which the change applied cleanly are updated both in the
	   index file and in your working tree.

	4. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three versions,
	   as described in the "TRUE MERGE" section of git-merge(1). The
	   working tree files will include a description of the conflict
	   bracketed by the usual conflict markers <<<<<<< and >>>>>>>.

	5. No other modifications are made.

       See git-merge(1) for some hints on resolving such conflicts.

OPTIONS
       <commit>...
	   Commits to cherry-pick. For a more complete list of ways to spell
	   commits, see gitrevisions(7). Sets of commits can be passed but no
	   traversal is done by default, as if the --no-walk option was
	   specified, see git-rev-list(1). Note that specifying a range will
	   feed all <commit>... arguments to a single revision walk (see a
	   later example that uses maint master..next).

       -e, --edit
	   With this option, git cherry-pick will let you edit the commit
	   message prior to committing.

       -x
	   When recording the commit, append a line that says "(cherry picked
	   from commit ...)" to the original commit message in order to
	   indicate which commit this change was cherry-picked from. This is
	   done only for cherry picks without conflicts. Do not use this
	   option if you are cherry-picking from your private branch because
	   the information is useless to the recipient. If on the other hand
	   you are cherry-picking between two publicly visible branches (e.g.
	   backporting a fix to a maintenance branch for an older release from
	   a development branch), adding this information can be useful.

       -r
	   It used to be that the command defaulted to do -x described above,
	   and -r was to disable it. Now the default is not to do -x so this
	   option is a no-op.

       -m parent-number, --mainline parent-number
	   Usually you cannot cherry-pick a merge because you do not know
	   which side of the merge should be considered the mainline. This
	   option specifies the parent number (starting from 1) of the
	   mainline and allows cherry-pick to replay the change relative to
	   the specified parent.

       -n, --no-commit
	   Usually the command automatically creates a sequence of commits.
	   This flag applies the changes necessary to cherry-pick each named
	   commit to your working tree and the index, without making any
	   commit. In addition, when this option is used, your index does not
	   have to match the HEAD commit. The cherry-pick is done against the
	   beginning state of your index.

	   This is useful when cherry-picking more than one commits' effect to
	   your index in a row.

       -s, --signoff
	   Add Signed-off-by line at the end of the commit message.

       --ff
	   If the current HEAD is the same as the parent of the cherry-pickā€™ed
	   commit, then a fast forward to this commit will be performed.

       --allow-empty
	   By default, cherry-picking an empty commit will fail, indicating
	   that an explicit invocation of git commit --allow-empty is
	   required. This option overrides that behavior, allowing empty
	   commits to be preserved automatically in a cherry-pick. Note that
	   when "--ff" is in effect, empty commits that meet the
	   "fast-forward" requirement will be kept even without this option.
	   Note also, that use of this option only keeps commits that were
	   initially empty (i.e. the commit recorded the same tree as its
	   parent). Commits which are made empty due to a previous commit are
	   dropped. To force the inclusion of those commits use
	   --keep-redundant-commits.

       --allow-empty-message
	   By default, cherry-picking a commit with an empty message will
	   fail. This option overrides that behaviour, allowing commits with
	   empty messages to be cherry picked.

       --keep-redundant-commits
	   If a commit being cherry picked duplicates a commit already in the
	   current history, it will become empty. By default these redundant
	   commits are ignored. This option overrides that behavior and
	   creates an empty commit object. Implies --allow-empty.

       --strategy=<strategy>
	   Use the given merge strategy. Should only be used once. See the
	   MERGE STRATEGIES section in git-merge(1) for details.

       -X<option>, --strategy-option=<option>
	   Pass the merge strategy-specific option through to the merge
	   strategy. See git-merge(1) for details.

SEQUENCER SUBCOMMANDS
       --continue
	   Continue the operation in progress using the information in
	   .git/sequencer. Can be used to continue after resolving conflicts
	   in a failed cherry-pick or revert.

       --quit
	   Forget about the current operation in progress. Can be used to
	   clear the sequencer state after a failed cherry-pick or revert.

       --abort
	   Cancel the operation and return to the pre-sequence state.

EXAMPLES
       git cherry-pick master
	   Apply the change introduced by the commit at the tip of the master
	   branch and create a new commit with this change.

       git cherry-pick ..master, git cherry-pick ^HEAD master
	   Apply the changes introduced by all commits that are ancestors of
	   master but not of HEAD to produce new commits.

       git cherry-pick maint next ^master, git cherry-pick maint master..next
	   Apply the changes introduced by all commits that are ancestors of
	   maint or next, but not master or any of its ancestors. Note that
	   the latter does not mean maint and everything between master and
	   next; specifically, maint will not be used if it is included in
	   master.

       git cherry-pick master~4 master~2
	   Apply the changes introduced by the fifth and third last commits
	   pointed to by master and create 2 new commits with these changes.

       git cherry-pick -n master~1 next
	   Apply to the working tree and the index the changes introduced by
	   the second last commit pointed to by master and by the last commit
	   pointed to by next, but do not create any commit with these
	   changes.

       git cherry-pick --ff ..next
	   If history is linear and HEAD is an ancestor of next, update the
	   working tree and advance the HEAD pointer to match next. Otherwise,
	   apply the changes introduced by those commits that are in next but
	   not HEAD to the current branch, creating a new commit for each new
	   change.

       git rev-list --reverse master -- README | git cherry-pick -n --stdin
	   Apply the changes introduced by all commits on the master branch
	   that touched README to the working tree and index, so the result
	   can be inspected and made into a single new commit if suitable.

       The following sequence attempts to backport a patch, bails out because
       the code the patch applies to has changed too much, and then tries
       again, this time exercising more care about matching up context lines.

	   $ git cherry-pick topic^		(1)
	   $ git diff				(2)
	   $ git reset --merge ORIG_HEAD	(3)
	   $ git cherry-pick -Xpatience topic^	(4)

       1. apply the change that would be shown by git show topic^. In this
       example, the patch does not apply cleanly, so information about the
       conflict is written to the index and working tree and no new commit
       results.
       2. summarize changes to be reconciled
       3. cancel the cherry-pick. In other words, return to the
       pre-cherry-pick state, preserving any local modifications you had in
       the working tree.
       4. try to apply the change introduced by topic^ again, spending extra
       time to avoid mistakes based on incorrectly matching context lines.

SEE ALSO
       git-revert(1)

GIT
       Part of the git(1) suite

Git 1.8.5.2			  01/09/2014		    GIT-CHERRY-PICK(1)
[top]

List of man pages available for Hurd

Copyright (c) for man pages and the logo by the respective OS vendor.

For those who want to learn more, the polarhome community provides shell access and support.

[legal] [privacy] [GNU] [policy] [cookies] [netiquette] [sponsors] [FAQ]
Tweet
Polarhome, production since 1999.
Member of Polarhome portal.
Based on Fawad Halim's script.
....................................................................
Vote for polarhome
Free Shell Accounts :: the biggest list on the net